A quick update on OPST, as the company recently reported 3Q results.

At a glance, the results from their first 3Qs don’t look that impressive. Revenues are up 2% YoY, and operating income has actually gone down 15% due to an increase in COGS.

However, I think this hides in a way the underlying strength of the business. Revenues for the third quarter alone were up 26%+, and operating income was up 65%+ due to a huge increase in gross margins.

So what’s going on here? Basically, the company’s first quarter last year was unusually strong as one of their customers stockpiled inventory. That’s making their year over year comparison look rougher than they really are.

But the company is 1) still (very) profitable 2) growing and 3) has a huge cash balance.

Let’s drill down a bit into 3 and then 2.

The company’s cash balance + marketable securities are up to $9.66m, or $12.45 per share. This for a profitable company trading at just over $13 per share!!!!

The question then becomes- how good is the business that you’re buying for that last $0.70 (~$550k)??

And it turns out it’s a pretty good one! ROIC is consistently >25% with strong margins, and the company is starting to show signs of good growth.

The company included this quote in their most recent 10-Q

Compared to the third quarter of Fiscal Year 2011, sales are up 26%. During the third quarter of 2012, the  company booked $1,197,000 in new orders compared to $1,949,000 in new orders booked for the second quarter of 2012 and $1,190,000 in new orders booked during the third quarter of 2011. Our backlog of unshipped orders was approximately $2,538,000 at the end of third quarter, down approximately 18% from $3,103,000 at the end of the second quarter of 2012 and up 64% from the $1,545,000 backlog at the end of the third quarter of 2011. We currently expect fourth quarter sales to be approximately $1,600,000.

So orders are flat year over year, backlog is up, and we have sales guidance.

Last year, the company included sales guidance in their 3Q 10-Q as well. They guided towards $1.1m in sales and ended up doing ~$1.2m.

So, based on the company’s guidance (which may prove too conservative), sales should growth 33% year over year. Profits should actually increase by more than that year over year because the company notes that they get a modest bit of operating leverage from increases in sales.

But even if we don’t model in any operating leverage, we can get a good approximation of what the business is going to earn. Using their sales forecast, revenue for the full year should come in at $6.4m. Assuming constant margins from the first 3Qs (a bit over 15%), operating income should come in at $985k, or ~$1.25 per share. If you assumed a normal tax rate of 35%, the business is generating $0.81 in EPS.

In other words, OPST is selling for a P/E of less than 1x after adjusting for cash.

I’ve said it before, but I think the right valuation for OPST is to value the business at 10x operating income, add in the value for their cash and securities, and use that as your “fair value” target. Perhaps you apply some form of discount to the cash because, even though management is not doing anything outrageous with it, it also appears they don’t have plans to distribute any time soon.

If you used that method, you would come up w/ a fair value for the operating business of $12.50 per share and a fair value for the cash of $12.45 to arrive at a target price of ~$25. Even if you used an 8x multiple for the business and applied a 40% discount to the cash, you’d get an op. business value of $10 and a cash value of ~$7.50 for a target price of $17.50.

In other words, no matter how you slide it, I think there’s a pretty strong margin of safety in OPST shares at today’s prices.

Disclosure: Long OPST

 

Bringing you the content on this site involves a significant amount of time and effort. If you like my work, please support my site by shopping at amazon.com! Doing so costs you nothing (the prices are the same as if you went to amazon directly) but results in referral fees for me that I use to support my site.

Disclaimer

The content contained in this blog represents only the opinions of its author(s). I may hold long or short positions in securities mentioned in the blog. In no way should anything on this website be considered investment advice and should never be relied on in making an investment decision. Read that last line again. Also, this blog is not a solicitation of business. The content herein is intended solely for the entertainment of the reader and the author(s).

Related posts:

  1. Reading the small print- $AEY, $OPST, $ATPG, $ASFI
  2. Opt-Sciences $OPST- Follow Up
  3. Well, that was quick… some quarterly updates ($JCTCF, $MPAD)
  4. Additional thoughts on the retailers
  5. Net-net update- Boss Holdings ($BSHI)

3 Responses to “$OPST update: still cheap, and growing fast!”

  1. I agree with all your points. But, since the firm has explicitly said in their 10K that they have no plans on paying a dividend, don’t you think it could be a potential value trap?

    Also, how much of your portfolio would you invest in this firm? Just trying to decide on sizing a potential position.

  2. sounds like EVI.

    I think with coming increases in dividend tax rates a lot of these “cash’d up” small caps with huge insider ownership would very much benefit from paying out their cash as dividends before the end of the year.

  3. While I understand wanting to get cash out of the business, there is something to be said with a corporation keeping it on their books in order to have a fortress balance sheet to survive a recession. EVI, as an example, may not have been able to survive the Great Recession without their huge cash horde, as the only way for them to complete orders at the time would have been to use credit…

    In regard to Opt Sciences, I am curious as to the “income producing securities” that they own. While the company is obviously cheap, I would worry that in a recession, these securities would go down in value and potentially need to be sold at the wrong time to finance the business. That said, it doesn’t seem like the company really needs any of the money to operate, as it is, well, invested… I guess they are hoping that the market will eventually assign the stock some multiple of the earnings that those investments produce?

    I would also worry that the securities may be in bonds of some sort. As an asset class, I am not a big fan of them at the moment…………..

Leave a Reply

(required)

(required)

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

© 2013 Whopper Investments Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha